• William B Lo, Bethany Chevill, Sunny Philip, Shakti Agrawal, and A Richard Walsh.
• Department of Neurosurgery, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, B4 6NH, UK. williamlo@doctors.org.uk.
• Childs Nerv Syst. 2021 Apr 1; 37 (4): 1237-1241.

PurposeThe recent VNS models (AspireSR® Model 106, SenTiva™ Model 1000 (VNS Therapy®, LivaNova)) include a new function of cardiac-based seizure detection (CBSD) automatic stimulation, known as 'AutoStim'. This algorithm uses tachycardia as a proxy to a seizure, and the battery delivers a closed-loop electrical current in addition to its programmed stimulation. This function leads to further seizure reduction in adults, but this advantage has not been reported in the paediatric population. This study aims to investigate whether battery change with AutoStim leads to further seizure reduction in children.MethodsThis observational study included the first 10 cases of VNS battery change from non-AutoStim to AutoStim function. During the battery change operation, the new VNS was switched on, with the same normal and magnet mode settings as the previous VNS. The AutoStim mode was activated at the same time. Data on seizure burden were collected at 3 time points: (1) before the first VNS insertion, (2) before battery replacement (post-1st VNS) and (3) 12 months post-battery change (post-AutoStim). The net effect of AutoStim, the only changed parameter, was evaluated by comparing the seizure burden prior to and 12 months following battery change in each child.ResultsThe seizure reduction improved significantly from 60 to 83% following battery change with AutoStim. Categorising the outcome according the McHugh classification, children achieving class I and II outcome (≥ 50% seizure reduction) improved from 70 to 90%.ConclusionThis is the first study to demonstrate the additional efficacy of AutoStim in children treated with VNS.

12 keywords...

hide…