• M Barann, W Meder, Z Dorner, M Brüss, H Bönisch, M Göthert, and B W Urban.
• Institut für Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, Universität Bonn, Germany. barann@mailer.meb.uni-bonn.de
• Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol. 2000 Sep 1;362(3):255-65.

AbstractThe patch-clamp technique was used on excised (outside-out) patches to characterize h5-HT3A receptors stably transfected in HEK 293 cells and to compare the effects of the barbiturate anaesthetics methohexital and pentobarbital on this ligand-gated cation channel. At negative membrane potentials 5-HT induced inward currents in a concentration-dependent manner (EC50=8.6 microM, Hill coefficient =1.5). The mean peak current induced by 30 microM 5-HT was -110 pA at -100 mV. The 5-HT3A receptor antagonist ondansetron (0.3 nM) reversibly inhibited the 5-HT (30 microM) signal by 70% and at 3 nM it abolished the response. Methohexital and pentobarbital inhibited 5-HT-induced (30 microM) currents in a concentration-dependent manner. The maximal inhibition with a given methohexital or pentobarbital concentration was reached when the respective drug was applied 45 s prior to and during the 2-s 5-HT pulse (IC50 values=95 microM and 127 microM, Hill coefficient = -1.0 and -1.6, respectively). Although the barbiturates were, thus, equipotent, their effects differed substantially with respect to the dependence on the time schedule of application to the patches: the potency of methohexital was virtually maximal when the drug was applied exclusively 45 s before the agonist pulse, but its inhibitory potency decreased considerably when it was exclusively applied during the 2-s 5-HT pulse (IC50=380 microM). Conversely, pentobarbital was almost maximally potent in inhibiting the 5-HT signal when it was exclusively coapplied with this agonist, but its inhibitory potency was considerably lower (IC50 approximately 500 microM) when applied exclusively 45 s before 5-HT. Another difference between both barbiturates involves the rate of inactivation of 5-HT3 receptor-mediated currents: whereas high concentrations of methohexital (> or = 300 microM) were necessary to induce moderate (< or = twofold) acceleration of this parameter, pentobarbital produced such an effect at all concentrations and the extent of acceleration increased with increasing concentration (1.5- to fivefold). In conclusion, two barbiturates, chemically closely related but of different lipophilicity, clearly differ with respect to the kinetics of their effect on 5-HT3 receptor channels; one possible explanation involves drug access to an amphipathic site of action via both an aqueous and a hydrophobic pathway. Pentobarbital, in contrast to methohexital, inhibits hS-HT3A receptor-mediated currents at anaesthetic concentrations (approximately 90 microM).

25 keywords...

hide…