• Brain · Dec 2016

    Microbleed and microinfarct detection in amyloid angiopathy: a high-resolution MRI-histopathology study.

    • Susanne J van Veluw, Andreas Charidimou, Andre J van der Kouwe, Arne Lauer, Yael D Reijmer, Isabel Costantino, M Edip Gurol, Geert Jan Biessels, Matthew P Frosch, Anand Viswanathan, and Steven M Greenberg.
    • 1 J. Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA svanveluw@mgh.harvard.edu.
    • Brain. 2016 Dec 1; 139 (Pt 12): 3151-3162.

    AbstractCerebral amyloid angiopathy is a common neuropathological finding in the ageing human brain, associated with cognitive impairment. Neuroimaging markers of severe cerebral amyloid angiopathy are cortical microbleeds and microinfarcts. These parenchymal brain lesions are considered key contributors to cognitive impairment. Therefore, they are important targets for therapeutic strategies and may serve as surrogate neuroimaging markers in clinical trials. We aimed to gain more insight into the pathological basis of magnetic resonance imaging-defined microbleeds and microinfarcts in cerebral amyloid angiopathy, and to explore the pathological burden that remains undetected, by using high and ultra-high resolution ex vivo magnetic resonance imaging, as well as detailed histological sampling. Brain samples from five cases (mean age 85 ± 6 years) with pathology-proven cerebral amyloid angiopathy and multiple microbleeds on in vivo clinical magnetic resonance imaging were subjected to high-resolution ex vivo 7 T magnetic resonance imaging. On the obtained high-resolution (200 μm isotropic voxels) ex vivo magnetic resonance images, 171 microbleeds were detected compared to 66 microbleeds on the corresponding in vivo magnetic resonance images. Of 13 sampled microbleeds that were matched on histology, five proved to be acute and eight old microhaemorrhages. The iron-positive old microhaemorrhages appeared approximately four times larger on magnetic resonance imaging compared to their size on histology. In addition, 48 microinfarcts were observed on ex vivo magnetic resonance imaging in three out of five cases (two cases exhibited no microinfarcts). None of them were visible on in vivo 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging after a retrospective analysis. Of nine sampled microinfarcts that were matched on histology, five were confirmed as acute and four as old microinfarcts. Finally, we explored the proportion of microhaemorrhage and microinfarct burden that is beyond the detection limits of ex vivo magnetic resonance imaging, by scanning a smaller sample at ultra-high resolution, followed by serial sectioning. At ultra-high resolution (75 μm isotropic voxels) magnetic resonance imaging we observed an additional 48 microbleeds (compared to high resolution), which proved to correspond to vasculopathic changes (i.e. morphological changes to the small vessels) instead of frank haemorrhages on histology. After assessing the serial sections of this particular sample, no additional haemorrhages were observed that were missed on magnetic resonance imaging. In contrast, nine microinfarcts were found in these sections, of which six were only retrospectively visible at ultra-high resolution. In conclusion, these findings suggest that microbleeds on in vivo magnetic resonance imaging are specific for microhaemorrhages in cerebral amyloid angiopathy, and that increasing the resolution of magnetic resonance images results in the detection of more 'non-haemorrhagic' pathology. In contrast, the vast majority of microinfarcts currently remain under the detection limits of clinical in vivo magnetic resonance imaging.© The Author (2016). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…