• Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg · Oct 2009

    Review

    Lung cancer screening and its efficacy.

    • Motoyasu Sagawa, Katsuo Usuda, Hirokazu Aikawa, Yuichiro Machida, Makoto Tanaka, Masakatsu Ueno, and Tsutomu Sakuma.
    • Department of Thoracic Surgery, Kanazawa Medical University, Uchinada, Ishikawa, Japan. sagawam@kanazawa-med.ac.jp
    • Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Oct 1;57(10):519-27.

    AbstractThe efficacy of lung cancer screening should not be evaluated by the survival rate of lung cancer patients but by lung cancer mortality in a certain population because the survival rate can be greatly affected by several types of bias. Randomized controlled trials that were conducted during the 1970s and 1980s in Europe and the United States failed to prove the efficacy of lung cancer screening in decreasing the mortality rate; but recently the results of case-control studies in Japan have revealed that undergoing currently available screening decreases the risk of lung cancer deaths by 30%-60%. A system is now being created in Japan whereby the guidelines regarding cancer screening will continue to be updated. The preliminary reports concerning lung cancer screening using thoracic computed tomography revealed that not only the detection rate of lung cancer but also the survival rate of detected lung cancer patients were surprisingly high. However, the presence of some potential bias in these studies cannot be ignored; therefore, it is still unknown whether there is actual efficacy. Several randomized controlled trials are presently in progress overseas, but the interim results were not favorable. A randomized controlled trial should therefore immediately be started in Japan as well.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…