• Sophie Putman, Henri Migaud, Gilles Pasquier, Julien Girard, Cristian Preda, and Alain Duhamel.
• Université de Lille, CHU de Lille, ULR 4490, Hôpital Salengro, 59000 Lille, France; Département universitaire de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, hôpital Roger-Salengro, CHU de Lille, place de Verdun, 59037 Lille, France; Université de Lille, CHU de Lille, EA 2694-Metrics: évaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, 59000 Lille, France. Electronic address: sophie.putman@wanadoo.fr.
• Orthop Traumatol Sur. 2021 May 1; 107 (3): 102824.

BackgroundThe HOOS and KOOS scoring questionnaires comprise respectively 40 and 42 items; a shorter 12-item version was recently developed, but remains to be validated in a French-speaking population. We therefore conducted a prospective study: 1) to determine whether the new 12-item versions in French are equivalent to the longer HOOS and KOOS versions, and 2) to validate the French-language HOOS-12 and KOOS-12 patient-reported outcome measures in a population of primary total hip and knee arthroplasty: validity, reliability, and responsiveness.HypothesisThe change in language in a score already validated in its long version does not alter its properties in the short version.Material And MethodsOne hundred patients (59 males, 41 females) undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty and 100 patients (43 males, 57 females) undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty were prospectively included. They filled out the original HOOS or KOOS questionnaires, their simplified versions (PS: Physical function Short form; JR: Joint Replacement) and the short HOOS-12 and KOOS-12 versions, and also the Oxford-12 score assessing the affected joint, preoperatively, then at 6-12 months.ResultsThe 100% response rate confirmed ease of use. There were no redundant items. There were strong correlations between the 12-item and longer versions (>0.9). The HOOS-12 and KOOS-12 scores were reliable and valid: 1) there were no ceiling or floor effects for pre- or postoperative KOOS-12 scores, although a ceiling effect was found for HOOS-12 postoperatively (20% of patients having maximum scores of 100); 2) internal consistency was confirmed, with Cronbach alpha>0.8; 3) external consistency between Oxford-12 and HOOS-12/KOOS-12 was excellent, with Pearson correlation coefficient>0.8. Sensitivity to pre-/postoperative change was confirmed, with effect size>0.8.DiscussionThe present study confirmed the usefulness of this new 12-item form for HOOS and KOOS. Properties were identical between the French- and English-language versions, authorising everyday use of these simpler versions.Level Of EvidenceIV; prospective study without control group.Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

19 keywords...

hide…