-
- K Nyamande, U G Lalloo, and F Vawda.
- Department of Medicine, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
- Br J Radiol. 2007 May 1; 80 (953): 302-6.
AbstractThe objective of the study was to determine the proportion of patients with missed lesions on plain chest radiographs compared with high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) in 49 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infected patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Patients underwent plain chest radiography and HRCT scans of the chest at admission. Microbiological investigations for CAP were performed. An experienced radiologist, without knowledge of clinical or pathological data, reported the chest radiographs and HRCT scans. The study group included 26 females and 23 males, aged 18-53 years (mean age 36 years). Organisms were isolated from 26 patients (53%). In 40 patients (82%), the HRCT scans demonstrated lesions not visualized on the plain chest radiographs. There was 100% correlation between plain radiographic and HRCT scan findings in nine cases (18%). Lesions that were not visualized on the plain radiographs but elucidated on HRCT included: pleural effusion (n = 14), ground-glass opacification (n = 20), pericardial effusion (n = 8), cavitation (n = 4), cysts (n = 4), bullae (n = 4), abscess (n = 1) and pneumothorax (n = 1). In 20 of 23 cases, hilar lymphadenopathy, identified on HRCT, was not recognized on plain chest radiographs. In patients in whom an organism was isolated, a correct HRCT diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis, bacterial pneumonia and Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) was made in 80%, 84% and 100% of cases, respectively. The proportion of patients with missed lesions on plain chest radiographs in HIV infected patients with CAP was high. This has important implications for management and prognosis. HRCT scans correlate well with the microbiological diagnosis when reported by an experienced radiologist.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.