• Matthew C Hernandez, Victor Y Kong, Johnathon M Aho, John L Bruce, Stephanie F Polites, Grant L Laing, Martin D Zielinski, and Damian L Clarke.
• From the Division of Trauma Critical Care and General Surgery (M.C.H., J.M.A., S.F.P., M.D.Z.), Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN; Department of Surgery (V.Y.K., J.L.B., G.L.L., D.L.C.), Pietermaritzburg Metropolitan Complex, University of Kwa-Zulu Natal, South Africa; and Biomedical Engineering and Physiology (J.M.A.), Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN.
• J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Jul 1; 83 (1): 175-181.

BackgroundSeverity of emergency general surgery (EGS) diseases has not been standardized until recently. The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) proposed an anatomic severity grading system for EGS diseases to facilitate communication and quality comparisons between providers and hospitals. Previous work has demonstrated validity of the system for appendicitis in the United States. To demonstrate generalizability, we aim to externally validate this grading system in South African patients with appendicitis.MethodsPatients with acute appendicitis during 2010 to 2016 were identified at multi-institutional sites within South Africa. Baseline demographics and procedure types were recorded, and AAST grades were assigned based on intraoperative findings. Outcomes included duration of stay, mortality, and Clavien-Dindo complications. Summary statistical univariate and nominal logistic regression analyses were performed to compare AAST grade and outcomes.ResultsA total of 1,415 patients with a median (interquartile range) age of 19 years (14-28 years) were included (55% men). One hundred percent underwent appendectomy: 63.5% completed via midline laparotomy, 36.5% via limited incision (31.8% via McBurney incision and 4.7% via laparoscopy). Overall, 30-day mortality rate was 1.4% with an overall complication rate of 44%. Most common complications included surgical site infection (n = 147, 10.4%), pneumonia (n = 105, 7.4%), and renal failure (n = 64, 4.5%). Distribution of AAST grade is as follows: Grade 0 (10, 0.7%), Grade 1 (247, 17.4%), Grade 2 (280, 19.8%), Grade 3 (158, 11.3%), Grade 4 (179, 12.6%), and Grade 5 (541, 38.2%). Increased median (interquartile range) AAST grades were recorded in patients with complications, 5 (3-5) compared with those without (2 [1-3], p = 0.001). Duration of stay was increased for patients with higher AAST grades: 4 and 5 (10.6 ± 5.9 days) versus I and II (3.6 ± 4.3 days; p = 0.001). Area under the receiver operating characteristic analysis to predict presence of any complication based on AAST grade was 0.90.ConclusionThe AAST EGS grading system is valid to predict important clinical outcomes in a South African population with an increased degree of severity on presentation. These results support generalizability of the AAST EGS grading system for appendicitis in a developing nation.Level Of EvidencePrognostic, level II.

18 keywords...

hide…