• Spinal cord · Jan 2014

    Comparative Study Clinical Trial

    Comparison of gait between healthy participants and persons with spinal cord injury when using a powered gait orthosis-a pilot study.

    • M Arazpour, S R Mehrpour, M A Bani, S W Hutchins, M Bahramizadeh, and M Rahgozar.
    • Orthotics and Prosthetics Department, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
    • Spinal Cord. 2014 Jan 1; 52 (1): 44-8.

    ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a powered gait orthosis (PGO) on the temporal-spatial parameters and kinematics of walking in both healthy participants and persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) using three-dimensional motion analysis to facilitate further development of such devices.MethodsKinematics and temporal spatial data were obtained from three healthy participants and four persons with SCI who walked using the same design of PGO.ResultsWalking speed was reduced by 28% and step length by 29% in healthy individuals when walking with PGO compared with normal walking and that recorded for persons with SCI was approximately one-third that of normal walking. There were significant differences in hip and knee joint ranges of motion in comparison between walking with PGO in healthy participants and walking with PGO in persons with SCI.ConclusionWalking with a PGO by healthy participants significantly reduced critical gait parameters, and further development work is needed to produce a more effective device to match closely the gait parameters of normal walking by healthy participants. Significant differences between normal walking and that evidenced with the PGO by both healthy participants and persons with SCI were detected.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…