• Eur J Health Econ · Sep 2006

    Costs and quality of life in multiple sclerosis in The Netherlands.

    • Gisela Kobelt, J Berg, P Lindgren, Bert Anten, Mattias Ekman, Peter J H Jongen, Chris Polman, and Bernard Uitdehaag.
    • Lund University, Lund, Sweden. gisela.kobelt@he-europe.com
    • Eur J Health Econ. 2006 Sep 1; 7 Suppl 2: S55-64.

    AbstractThis cost-of-illness analysis based on information from 1.549 patients in The Netherlands is part of a Europe-wide study on the costs of multiple sclerosis (MS). The objective was to analyze the costs and quality of life (QOL) related to the level of disease severity and progression. Patients from three specialized MS centres participated in the survey by answering a mail questionnaire (response rate, 52%). In addition to details on the disease (type of disease, relapses, level of functional disability), the questionnaire asked for information on all resource consumption, medical, non-medical, work absence, early retirement and informal care as well as QOL (expressed as utility). The mean age of the cohort was 47 years, and 7.6% of patients were 65 years of age or more. Forty-eight percent of patients had mild disease [Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 0-3], 40% moderate disease (EDSS score of 4-6.5) and 11% severe disease (EDSS score of 7 and above). The mean EDSS score in the sample was 3.9 (median 4.0), with a utility of 0.61. Costs and utility are highly correlated with disease severity. Workforce participation decreases from around 75 to 80% in early disease to less than 5% in the very late stages. Hospitalization is very infrequent in early disease, representing less than euro 500 per year for patients at EDSS scores below 6, but increases steeply for patients at an EDSS score of 7 and above. Ambulatory care increases fivefold between early and late disease, while services rise from basically no cost to almost euro 8.000 per year at an EDSS score of 7 and euro 19.000 per year at EDSS scores of 8-9. Productivity losses are multiplied by 10 in late disease, while informal care increases from euro 300 per year at EDSS scores of 0-1 to nearly euro 15.000 per year at EDSS scores of 8-9. Hence, total mean costs per patient are driven essentially by the distribution of the severity levels in the sample, increasing from euro 9.300 per year at EDSS scores of 0-1 to euro 50.000 per year at an EDSS score of 7 and euro 78.000 per year at EDSS scores of 8-9. The same is true for utility, which decreases from 0.85 to 0.05 as the disease becomes severe. However, the utility loss compared to the age- and gender-matched general population is high at all levels of the disease (0.25 at an EDSS score of 2 to 0.4 at EDSS scores of 5-6), leading to an estimated annual loss of 0.24 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) per patient. Relapses for patients with an EDSS score below 5 are associated with a cost of around euro 2.800 and a utility loss of 0.15 during the quarter in which they occur.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…