• NeuroImage · Jan 2020

    Expertise for conspecific face individuation in the human brain.

    • Fabrice Damon, Arnaud Leleu, Diane Rekow, Fanny Poncet, and Jean-Yves Baudouin.
    • Centre des Sciences du Goût et de l'Alimentation, AgroSup Dijon, CNRS, INRA, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, F-21000, Dijon, France. Electronic address: fabrice.damon@u-bourgogne.fr.
    • Neuroimage. 2020 Jan 1; 204: 116218.

    AbstractHumans exhibit a marked specialization to process the most experienced facial morphologies. In particular, nonhuman primate faces are poorly discriminated compared to human faces in behavioral tasks. So far however, a clear and consistent marker that quantifies our expertise in human over monkey face discrimination directly from brain activity is lacking. Here, using scalp electroencephalography (EEG), we isolate a direct signature of individuation abilities for human and nonhuman (i.e., macaque faces) primate faces. Human or monkey faces were rapidly presented at a base rate of 12 Hz in upright or inverted orientations while participants performed an orthogonal behavioral task. In each stimulation sequence, eight face images of one individual were used as base stimuli, while images of other individuals were briefly introduced every 9th stimulus to quantify an identity-change response at 1.33 Hz and harmonics (i.e., integer multiples) in the EEG frequency spectrum. The brain response to upright human faces was twice as large as to monkey faces, and reduced following picture-plane inversion for human faces only. This reflects the disruption of high-level face identity discrimination developed for the canonical upright human face. No difference was observed between upright monkey faces and inverted human faces, suggesting non-expert visual processes for those two face formats associated with little experience. In addition, the size of the inversion effect for human, but not monkey faces, was predictive of the expertise effect (i.e., difference between upright human and monkey faces) at the individual level. This result suggests a selective ability to discriminate human faces that does not contribute to the individuation of other unexperienced face morphologies such as monkey faces. Overall, these findings indicate that human expertise for conspecific face discrimination can be isolated and quantified in individual human brains.Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.