• Daniel A Effron, Dale T Miller, and Benoît Monin.
• Dispute Resolution Research Center, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, 2001 Sheridan Road 371, Evanston, IL 60208-2001, USA. d-effron@kellogg.northwestern.edu
• J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Dec 1; 103 (6): 916-32.

AbstractSix experiments examined how people strategically use thoughts of foregone misdeeds to regulate their moral behavior. We tested 2 hypotheses: 1st, that people will feel licensed to act in morally dubious ways when they can point to immoral alternatives to their prior behavior, and 2nd, that people made to feel insecure about their morality will exaggerate the extent to which such alternatives existed. Supporting the 1st hypothesis, when White participants could point to racist alternatives to their past actions, they felt they had obtained more evidence of their own virtue (Study 1), they expressed less racial sensitivity (Study 2), and they were more likely to express preferences about employment and allocating money that favored Whites at the expense of Blacks (Study 3). Supporting the 2nd hypothesis, White participants whose security in their identity as nonracists had been threatened remembered a prior task as having afforded more racist alternatives to their behavior than did those who were not threatened. This distortion of the past involved overestimating the number of Black individuals they had encountered on the prior task (Study 4) and exaggerating how stereotypically Black specific individuals had looked (Studies 5 and 6). We discuss implications for moral behavior, the motivated rewriting of one's moral history, and how the life unlived can liberate people to lead the life they want.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved).

16 keywords...

hide…