-
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care · Sep 2013
Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of current and next-generation assays for cardiac troponin I in the BWH-TIMI ED Chest Pain Study.
- Marc P Bonaca, Christian T Ruff, Joshua Kosowsky, Michael J Conrad, Sabina A Murphy, Marc S Sabatine, Petr Jarolim, and David A Morrow.
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2013 Sep 1;2(3):195-202.
BackgroundRapid diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome is a clinical and operational priority in busy emergency departments (ED). We examined the performance of an investigational troponin I (TnI) assay with 10-100-times greater sensitivity than current commercial assays.MethodsAmong patients with non-traumatic chest pain enrolled in the BWH-TIMI ED Chest Pain Study, we measured TnI (n=381) at baseline, 4-6 h, and 12-24 h with an investigational assay (S-TnI; Singulex, detection-limit 0.0002 µg/l, 99th percentile 0.009 µg/l) and a contemporary sensitive assay (TnI-Ultra; Siemens, detection-limit 0.006 µg/l, 99th percentile 0.04 µg/l). Final diagnosis was adjudicated using all diagnostic data and local hospital-based cardiac TnI (Siemens), blinded to investigational cardiac Tn.ResultsThe adjudicated diagnosis was myocardial infarction (MI) in 96 patients, unstable angina in 41, and acute non-coronary cardiovascular conditions in 50 patients. Baseline S-TnI was highly sensitive for MI (97%, 95% CI 91-99%) with specificity 81% (95% CI 76-86%) and positive predictive value 63% (95% CI 55-71%). The negative predictive value with S-TnI was 99% (95% CI 96-100%). S-TnI had better diagnostic accuracy than the local assay (area under the curve 0.976 vs. 0.916, p=0.003). Among 20 patients with negative baseline TnI and diagnosis of MI, 19 had elevated baseline S-TnI. Compared to TnI-Ultra, S-TnI trended toward higher sensitivity (97 vs. 94%, p=NS) but did not differ significantly in negative predictive value (99 vs. 98%) or area under the curve (p=0.29).ConclusionCurrent and investigational Tn assays substantially increased clinical sensitivity and improved diagnostic accuracy for MI, despite a decline in specificity. A contemporary sensitive assay delivered similar overall accuracy to the investigational test, suggesting that we have reached a point of maximum diagnostic return with increasing analytical sensitivity.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.