• Corrine I Voils, Maren K Olsen, Jennifer M Gierisch, Megan A McVay, Janet M Grubber, Leslie Gaillard, Jamiyla Bolton, Matthew L Maciejewski, Elizabeth Strawbridge, and William S Yancy.
• From Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Duke University Medical Center, and Duke University Diet and Fitness Center, Durham, North Carolina.
• Ann. Intern. Med. 2017 Apr 4; 166 (7): 463471463-471.

BackgroundWeight regain after successful weight loss interventions is common.ObjectiveTo establish the efficacy of a weight loss maintenance program compared with usual care in obese adults.Design2-group, parallel, randomized trial stratified by initial weight loss (<10 kg vs. ≥10 kg), conducted from 20 August 2012 to 18 December 2015. Outcome assessors were blinded to treatment assignment. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01357551).Setting3 primary care clinics at the Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Durham and Raleigh, North Carolina.PatientsObese outpatients (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2) who lost 4 kg or more of body weight during a 16-week, group-based weight loss program.InterventionThe maintenance intervention, delivered primarily by telephone, addressed satisfaction with outcomes, relapse-prevention planning, self-monitoring, and social support. Usual care involved no contact except for study measurements.MeasurementsPrimary outcome was mean weight regain at week 56. Secondary outcomes included self-reported caloric intake, walking, and moderate physical activity.ResultsOf 504 patients in the initial program, 222 lost at least 4 kg of body weight and were randomly assigned to maintenance (n = 110) or usual care (n = 112). Retention was 85%. Most patients were middle-aged white men. Mean weight loss during initiation was 7.2 kg (SD, 3.1); mean weight at randomization was 103.6 kg (SD, 20.4). Estimated mean weight regain was statistically significantly lower in the intervention (0.75 kg) than the usual care (2.36 kg) group (estimated mean difference, 1.60 kg [95% CI, 0.07 to 3.13 kg]; P = 0.040). No statistically significant differences in secondary outcomes were seen at 56 weeks. No adverse events directly attributable to the intervention were observed.LimitationsResults may not generalize to other settings or populations. Dietary intake and physical activity were self-reported. Duration was limited to 56 weeks.ConclusionAn intervention focused on maintenance-specific strategies and delivered in a resource-conserving way modestly slowed the rate of weight regain in obese adults.Primary Funding SourceVeterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Service.

19 keywords...

hide…