• H Matsumoto, K Shingu, K Numata, S Ogura, K Hanaoka, H Ito, T Kugimiya, T Kazama, K Ikeda, M Murakawa, K Mori, T Mashimo, I Yoshiya, M Morio, M Nakao, and A Sato.
• Department of Anesthesiology, Kansai Medical University, Moriguchi.
• Masui. 1998 Sep 1;47(9):1046-58.

AbstractA randomized, prospective and multi-institutional study was performed to investigate whether different anesthetic methods affected differently the quality of recovery from anesthesia. Two hundred and eleven patients were allocated to one of two groups; total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol and fentanyl (group P, n = 107) and general anesthesia with thiopental, sevoflurane and nitrous oxide (group TS, n = 104). The rapidity of emergence from anesthesia and postoperative incidence of nausea, vomiting, and headache were compared between the two groups. The group P showed significantly shorter emergence times for verbal command responses (7.4 +/- 5.6 min), extubation (10.0 +/- 6.0 min) and orientation (13.1 +/- 7.8 min) than the group TS (9.1 +/- 5.0 min, 11.7 +/- 6.2 min, 16.4 +/- 7.9 min, respectively). The postoperative incidence of vomiting was not significantly different between the two groups (3.7% in the group P and 9.6% in the group TS), but the postoperative incidences of nausea and headache were significantly lower in the group P compared with the group TS (10.3%, 17.8%, respectively in the group P and 34.6%, 29.8%, respectively in the group TS). We conclude that TIVA with propofol is advantageous than thiopental-sevoflurane anesthesia in the recovery phase.

23 keywords...

hide…