• Juecan Wu, Jinghua Lu, and Chengyang Jiang.
• Department of Acupuncture and Tuina, Hangzhou Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
• Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 May 27; 101 (21): e29171e29171.

BackgroundSeveral studies have reported positive therapeutic effects of electroacupuncture, warm needling, or a combination of the 2 for heel pain; however, the quality of the evidence is limited by methodological limitations. Given that there are no high-quality meta-analyses or reviews incorporating the available evidence, the aim of this study was to systematically review the level I evidence in the literature to determine whether a combination of electroacupuncture and warm needling therapy is more beneficial than acupuncture alone in patients with plantar heel pain syndrome.MethodsFrom the inception to May 2022, the Wanfang, CNKI, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library electronic databases will be searched using the key phrases "acupuncture", "warm needling", "electroacupuncture", "heel pain", "plantar pain", and "prospective" for all relevant studies. The outcomes include pain, physical disability, plantar fascia thickness, and foot functional status. Quality assessment of all studies included in this review will be independently assessed by 2 reviewers using the Cochrane Collaborations tool. We consider significant heterogeneity between trials if I2 > 50%, and severe heterogeneity if I2 > 75%. When significant heterogeneity is indicated, we will find the source of heterogeneity by subgroup or sensitivity analysis.ResultsThe results of our review will be reported strictly following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guidelines and the recommendations of the Cochrane Collaboration.ConclusionsWe initially hypothesized that combination therapy would lead to better treatment outcomes.Registration number: 10.17605/OSF.IO/VWBYJ.Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

28 keywords...

hide…