• Chongxiang Xue, Huijing Dong, Ying Chen, Xingyu Lu, Shuyue Zheng, and Huijuan Cui.
• Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
• J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2022 Jun 1; 32 (6): 779-788.

AbstractLung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the benefits and risks of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Online databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov, were retrospectively and systematically searched for eligible trials from database inception to May 2021. A total of 792 patients from 21 clinical trials were included. For surgical data, the pooled operation rate and R0 resection rate were 92% (95% CI 87-96%) and 97% (95% CI 94-99%). Additionally, neoadjuvant ICIs achieved a major pathological response (MPR) of 39% (95% CI 25-53%), including 25% (95% CI 16-36%) pathological complete response (pCR). With radiological response assessment, the pooled objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 44% (95% CI 21-68%) and 88% (95% CI 75-98%), respectively. In terms of safety, the pooled rate of any-grade and grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse effects (TRAEs) were 57% (95% CI 38-76%) and 15% (95% CI 6-28%). Eventually, the study concludes that neoadjuvant ICIs are effective and safe for patients with early-stage NSCLC. Key Words: Neoadjuvant therapy, Immune checkpoint inhibitors, Non-small cell lung cancer, Meta-analysis.

25 keywords...

hide…