• Yeon Ju La, Hye Rim Kim, Dong Hyun Oh, Jin Young Ahn, and Yong Chan Kim.
• Department of Internal Medicine, Kangwon National University Hospital, Chuncheon, Korea.
• Yonsei Med. J. 2022 Jul 1; 63 (7): 611-618.

PurposeThis study aimed to provide compelling evidence of anti-staphylococcal beta-lactam use for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (MSSA BSI).Materials And MethodsWe retrospectively collected data on patients with MSSA BSI who were admitted to two academic tertiary-care hospitals from 2010 to 2018. Only patients who received nafcillin, cefazolin, vancomycin, or teicoplanin as definitive therapy were included. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. To perform unbiased comparisons between both treatments, we used inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis.ResultsA total of 359 patients were divided into two groups based on the definitive therapy used: beta-lactams (n=203), including nafcillin or cefazolin; and glycopeptides (n=156), including vancomycin or teicoplanin. In the IPTW analysis, glycopeptides were associated with significantly increased odds of 28-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 3.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.71-6.61; p<0.001). The rate of primary outcome in prespecified subgroups was largely consistent with the main analysis.ConclusionDefinitive therapy with beta-lactams in patients with MSSA BSI was associated with lower 28-day mortality compared to definitive therapy with glycopeptides.© Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2022.

31 keywords...

hide…