-
Multicenter Study
Learning Curve of Laparoscopic Gastrectomy: A Multicenter Study.
- Hylke J F Brenkman, Linda Claassen, Gerjon Hannink, Leonie R van der Werf, Jelle P-H Ruurda, Grard A P Nieuwenhuizen, LuyerMisha D PMDPCatharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, The Netherlands., Ewout A Kouwenhoven, Marc J van Det, Mark I van Berge Henegouwen, Suzanne S Gisbertz, StootJan H M BJHMBZuyderland Medical Center, Sittard, The Netherlands., HulsewéKarel W EKWEZuyderland Medical Center, Sittard, The Netherlands., Frans van Workum, Richard van Hillegersberg, and Camiel Rosman.
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
- Ann. Surg. 2023 Apr 1; 277 (4): e808e816e808-e816.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the learning curve of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) after an implementation program.BackgroundAlthough LG is increasingly being performed worldwide, little is known about the learning curve.MethodsConsecutive patients who underwent elective LG for gastric adenocarcinoma with curative intent in each of the 5 highest-volume centers in the Netherlands were enrolled. Generalized additive models and a 2-piece model with a break point were used to determine the learning curve length. Analyses were corrected for casemix and were performed for LG and for the subgroups distal gastrectomy (LDG) and total gastrectomy (LTG). The learning curve effect was assessed for (1) anastomotic leakage; and (2) the occurrence of postoperative complications, conversions to open surgery, and short-term oncological parameters.ResultsIn total 540 patients were included for analysis, 108 patients from each center; 268 patients underwent LDG and 272 underwent LTG. First, for LG, no learning effect regarding anastomotic leakage could be identified: the rate of anastomotic leakage initially increased, then reached a plateau after 36 cases at 10% anastomotic leakage. Second, the level of overall complications reached a plateau after 20 cases, at 38% overall complications, and at 5% conversions. For both LDG and LTG, each considered separately, fluctuations in secondary outcomes and anastomotic leakage followed fluctuations in casemix.ConclusionOn the basis of our study of the first 108 procedures of LG in 5 high-volume centers with well-trained surgeons, no learning curve effect could be identified regarding anastomotic leakage. A learning curve effect was found with respect to overall complications and conversion rate.Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.