• Naosuke Kamei, Kazuyoshi Nakanishi, Toshio Nakamae, Takayuki Tamura, Yuji Tsuchikawa, Taiki Moisakos, Takahiro Harada, Toshiaki Maruyama, and Nobuo Adachi.
• Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
• Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Aug 26; 101 (34): e29982.

AbstractIncreases in aging populations have raised the number of patients with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) without fractures due to compression of the cervical spinal cord. In such patients, it is necessary to clarify whether SCI or cervical compressive myelopathy (CCM) is the cause of disability after trauma. This study aimed to clarify the differences in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features between SCI and CCM. Overall, 60 SCI patients and 60 CCM patients with intramedullary high-intensity lesions on T2-weighted MRI were included in this study. The longitudinal lengths of the intramedullary T2 high-intensity lesions were measured using sagittal MRI sections. Snake-eye appearance on axial sections was assessed as a characteristic finding of CCM. The T2 values of the high-intensity lesions and normal spinal cords at the first thoracic vertebra level were measured, and the contrast ratio was calculated using these values. The longitudinal length of T2 high-intensity lesions was significantly longer in SCI patients than in CCM patients. Snake-eye appearance was found in 26 of the 60 CCM patients, but not in SCI patients. On both the sagittal and axial images, the contrast ratio was significantly higher in the SCI group than in the CCM group. Based on these results, a diagnostic scale was created. This scale made it possible to distinguish between SCI and CCM with approximately 90% accuracy.Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

20 keywords...

hide…