-
- George N Ioannou, BohnertAmy S BASBDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Medical School, and Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan (A.S.B.B.)., Ann M O'Hare, Edward J Boyko, Matthew L Maciejewski, Valerie A Smith, C Barrett Bowling, Elizabeth Viglianti, Theodore J Iwashyna, Denise M Hynes, Kristin Berry, and COVID-19 Observational Research Collaboratory (CORC).
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Washington, and Research and Development and Division of Gastroenterology, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington (G.N.I.).
- Ann. Intern. Med. 2022 Dec 1; 175 (12): 169317061693-1706.
BackgroundThe effectiveness of a third mRNA COVID-19 vaccine dose (booster dose) against the Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant is uncertain, especially in older, high-risk populations.ObjectiveTo determine mRNA booster vaccine effectiveness (VE) against SARS-CoV-2 infection, hospitalization, and death in the Omicron era by booster type, primary vaccine type, time since primary vaccination, age, and comorbidity burden.DesignRetrospective matched cohort study designed to emulate a target trial of booster vaccination versus no booster, conducted from 1 December 2021 to 31 March 2022.SettingU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs health care system.ParticipantsPersons who had received 2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine doses at least 5 months earlier.InterventionBooster monovalent mRNA vaccination (Pfizer-BioNTech's BNT162b2 or Moderna's mRNA-1273) versus no booster.MeasurementsBooster VE.ResultsEach group included 490 838 well-matched persons, who were predominantly male (88%), had a mean age of 63.0 years (SD, 14.0), and were followed for up to 121 days (mean, 79.8 days). Booster VE more than 10 days after a booster dose was 42.3% (95% CI, 40.6% to 43.9%) against SARS-CoV-2 infection, 53.3% (CI, 48.1% to 58.0%) against SARS-CoV-2-related hospitalization, and 79.1% (CI, 71.2% to 84.9%) against SARS-CoV-2-related death. Booster VE was similar for different booster types (BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273), age groups, and primary vaccination regimens but was significantly higher with longer time since primary vaccination and higher comorbidity burden.LimitationPredominantly male population.ConclusionBooster mRNA vaccination was highly effective in preventing death and moderately effective in preventing infection and hospitalization for up to 4 months after administration in the Omicron era. Increased uptake of booster vaccination, which is currently suboptimal, should be pursued to limit the morbidity and mortality of SARS-CoV-2 infection, especially in persons with high comorbidity burden.Primary Funding SourceU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.