• Medicine · Nov 2022

    Comparison arthroscopic reconstruction and percutaneous reconstruction of ankle lateral ligament for chronic ankle lateral instability: A protocol for a meta-analysis of comparative studies.

    • Huiming Hou, Ming Zhou, Xing Zhou, Wenxuan Guo, Rujie Zhuang, Hong Yin, and Jinlei Li.
    • Nanchang Hongdu Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang City, China.
    • Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Nov 11; 101 (45): e31926e31926.

    BackgroundAnkle sprains occur very frequently in daily life, but people who do not pay attention to them and do not receive proper diagnosis and treatment are very prone to develop chronic ankle lateral instability (CALI) at a later stage. For CALI where conservative treatment has failed, reconstruction of the lateral collateral ligament of the ankle can achieve satisfactory results, but there are various and controversial ways of ligament reconstruction. While percutaneous reconstruction of ankle lateral ligament (PLCLR) needs to be performed repeatedly under fluoroscopy, total arthroscopic reconstruction of ankle lateral ligament (ALCLR) is increasingly recognized by experts and scholars for its minimally invasive and precise characteristics, and has achieved good clinical results. Therefore, it is imperative that a meta-analysis be performed to provide evidence as to whether there is a difference between ALCLR and PLCLR in the treatment of CALI.MethodsWe will search articles in 7 electronic databases including Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, Chinese Scientific Journals Database, Chinese databases SinoMed, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. All the publications, with no time restrictions, will be searched without any restriction of language and status, the time from the establishment of the database to September 2022.We will apply the risk-of-bias tool of the Cochrane Collaboration for Randomized Controlled Trials to assess the methodological quality. Risk-of-Bias Assessment Tool for Non-randomized Studies was used to evaluate the quality of comparative studies. Statistical analysis will be conducted using RevMan 5.4 software.ResultsThis systematic review will evaluate the functional outcomes and radiographic results of ALCLR in the treatment of CALI.ConclusionThe conclusion of this study will provide evidence for judging whether ALCLR is superior to PLCLR for treatment of CALI.Trial Registration NumberCRD42022362045.Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…