• Dustin Dunnick, Keoni Kins, Dharini M Bhammar, and Brian K Schilling.
• Department of Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Science, Arkansas Tech University, Russellville, AR 72801, USA.
• Mil Med. 2024 Jan 23; 189 (1-2): e136e140e136-e140.

AbstractMilitary tactical athletes face the unique task of performing physically demanding occupational duties, often while wearing body armor. Forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume measured using spirometry have been shown to decrease, while wearing plate-carrier style body armor, little is known about the comprehensive effects of wearing body armor on pulmonary function, including lung capacities. Further, the effects of loaded body armor vs. unloaded on pulmonary function are also unknown. Therefore, this study examined how loaded and unloaded body armor affects pulmonary function. Twelve college-aged males performed spirometry and plethysmography under three conditions (basic athletic attire [CNTL], unloaded plate carrier [UNL], and loaded plate carrier [LOAD]). Compared to CNTL, LOAD and UNL conditions significantly reduced functional residual capacity by 14% and 17%, respectively. Compared with CNTL, LOAD condition also showed a small but statistically significant lowered forced vital capacity (P = .02, d = 0.3), a 6% lower total lung capacity (P < .01, d = 0.5), and lowered maximal voluntary ventilation (P = .04, d = 0.4). A loaded plate-carrier style body armor exerts a restrictive effect on total lung capacity, and both loaded and unloaded body armor affects functional residual capacity, which could impact breathing mechanics during exercise. Resulting endurance performance decreases may need to be factored based on the style and loading of body armor, especially for longer-duration operations.© The Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2023. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

15 keywords...

hide…