-
Observational Study
1-hour versus 3-hour 99mTc-PYP imaging to evaluate suspected cardiac transthyretin amyloidosis.
- Kenneth J Nichols, Se-Young Yoon, Andrew Van Tosh, and Christopher J Palestro.
- Department of Radiology, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY.
- Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 May 19; 102 (20): e33817e33817.
AbstractThe diagnosis of cardiac transthyretin amyloidosis can involve early or delayed 99mTc-pyrophosphate planar, single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and/or SPECT/CT imaging. We investigated whether image interpretations differed among modalities and time points. In this observational study, data were reviewed for 173 patients with suspected transthyretin amyloidosis who underwent planar and SPECT/CT 1 and 3 hours after radiopharmaceutical injection. Planar heart-to-contralateral lung ratios were calculated. Myocardial-to-rib uptake was independently scored on SPECT and SPECT/CT as follows: 0 (negative), 1 < rib (equivocal), 2 = rib (positive), or 3 > rib (positive), and the image quality was as follows:1 (poor), 2 (adequate), and 3 (good). Three-hour SPECT/CT readings were used as the reference standard against which the other readings were compared. Twenty-five percent of patients were positive (3-hour SPECT/CT score ≥ 2). Compared to 3-hour SPECT/CT readings, there was "fair agreement" (κ = .27 - .33) with SPECT, and "fair agreement" (κ = .23 - .31) with planar imaging at 1 and 3 hours. More patients had abnormal SPECT and SPECT/CT than planar imaging (24-25% vs 16-17%, P < .007). There were more equivocal cases for 1 and 3 hours planar imaging than for 1 and 3 hours SPECT (71-73% vs 23-26%, P < .001) and 1 and 3 hours SPECT/CT (3-5%, P < .001). SPECT/CT image quality was higher at 3 hours than at 1 hour and higher than that on SPECT (P = .001). Three-hour SPECT/CT readings provided the highest number of definitive readings, had the highest image quality, and constituted the preferred protocol for evaluating unselected populations of patients that have a clinical suspicion of possible cardiac amyloidosis.Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.