• Reed W Kamyszek, Noah Newman, Jacqueline W Ragheb, Michael W Sjoding, Hyeon Joo, Michael D Maile, Ruth B Cassidy, Jessica R Golbus, Michigan Congestive Heart Failure Investigators, Milo C Engoren, and Michael R Mathis.
• Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
• J Clin Anesth. 2023 Nov 1; 90: 111226111226.

Study ObjectiveTo quantify preoperative heart failure (HF) diagnostic agreement and identify characteristics of patients in whom physicians agreed versus disagreed about the diagnosis.DesignObservational cohort study.SettingPatients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery at an academic center between 2015 and 2019.Patients40,659 patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery, among which a stratified subsample of 1018 patients with and without documented HF was reviewed.InterventionsVia a panel of physicians frequently managing patients with HF (cardiologists, cardiac anesthesiologists, intensivists), detailed chart reviews were performed (two per patient; median review time 32 min per reviewer per patient) to render adjudicated HF diagnoses.MeasurementsAdjudicated diagnostic agreement measures (percent agreement, Krippendorf's alpha) and univariate comparisons (standardized differences) between patients in whom physicians agreed versus disagreed about the preoperative HF diagnosis.Main ResultsAmong patients with documented HF, physicians agreed about the diagnosis in 80.0% of cases (consensus positive), disagreed in 13.8% (disagreement), and refuted the diagnosis in 6.3% (consensus negative). Conversely, among patients without documented HF, physicians agreed about the diagnosis in 88.0% (consensus negative), disagreed in 8.4% (disagreement), and refuted the diagnosis in 3.6% (consensus positive). The estimated agreement for the 40,659 cases was 91.1% (95% CI 88.3%-93.9%); Krippendorff's alpha was 0.77 (0.75-0.80). Compared to patients in whom physicians agreed about a HF diagnosis, patients in whom physicians disagreed exhibited fewer guideline-defined HF diagnostic criteria.ConclusionsPhysicians usually agree about HF diagnoses adjudicated via chart review, although disagreement is not uncommon and may be partly explained by heterogeneous clinical presentations. Our findings inform preoperative screening processes by identifying patients whose characteristics contribute to physician disagreement via chart review. Clinical Trial Number / Registry URL: Not applicable.Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.

10 keywords...

hide…