• Ichiyo Shibahara, Hideto Komai, Mitsuhiro Shinoda, and Toshihiro Kumabe.
• Department of Neurosurgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan. Electronic address: shibahar@med.kitasato-u.ac.jp.
• World Neurosurg. 2023 Dec 1; 180: 110110.

AbstractButterfly glioblastoma (bGB) poses significant surgical challenges, yet recent findings have highlighted the potential of surgical decompression in extending patient survival.1-10 The selection of a surgical strategy for bGB varies across studies. Generally, the side with a larger tumor volume is a preferred approach route, and the nondominant hemisphere is preferred when both tumors are similar in size. The contralateral tumor is removed via the resection cavity of the ipsilateral side,11 with successful utilization of endoscopic-assisted techniques.8 In the case of deep-seated bGB covered with a thick intact brain, accessing the tumor requires creating an invasive corridor, therefore minimizing the damage to the intact brain is ideal. A man in his 70s presented the new-onset seizure. Preoperatively, the patient exhibited a Karnofsky performance status of 50% without any motor deficits, and magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated a deep-seated anterior bGB with a larger tumor volume on the left dominant side. Imaging showed the tumor located just beneath the bilateral superior frontal sulci. Therefore we used these sulci to access the tumor with the minimum cut of the intact brain while preserving the frontal aslant tracts and used bilateral interhemispheric approaches to protect the cingulate bundles. We conducted the same technique for another deep-seated anterior bGB case, both resulting in postoperative Karnofsky performance status improvements (Video 1). Tailoring the surgical approach to the unique characteristics of each bGB case is important. The patients consented to the procedure and the publication of their images.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

16 keywords...

hide…