• J Clin Anesth · Dec 2023

    Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study

    GlideScope versus C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope for double-lumen tube intubation in patients with anticipated difficult airways: A multi-center, prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

    • Ping Huang, Yuwei Qiu, Ting Xu, Xiaoqiong Sun, Zhixing Lu, Yunyun Zhang, Jiangli Yu, Jingxiang Wu, Diansan Su, and Zhenling Huang.
    • Department of Anesthesiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
    • J Clin Anesth. 2023 Dec 1; 91: 111274111274.

    Study ObjectiveVideolaryngoscopes are widely used to visualize difficult airways. Our aim was to compare the GlideScope and C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscopes for double-lumen tube (DLT) intubation in patients with difficult airways.DesignA multi-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial.SettingThree comprehensive tertiary, high-volume hospitals from 5 December 2020 to 4 November 2021.PatientsWe included 348 adult patients with anticipated difficult airways who underwent elective thoracic surgery.InterventionsPatients were randomized into two groups: GlideScope and C-MAC D-blade. Following anesthesia induction, DLT intubation was performed using different videolaryngoscopes.MeasurementsThe primary outcome was the first-pass success rate of DLT intubation. All other results were recorded as secondary outcomes.Main ResultsNo significant differences were observed in the first-pass success rate of DLT intubation between the GlideScope and C-MAC D-blade (86.21% and 89.66%, respectively; P = 0.323). However, compared with the GlideScope, the C-MAC D-blade provided a lower Cormack-Lehane grade (P < 0.001), lower rates of external laryngeal pressure (48 vs. 15, P < 0.001), and postprocedure sore throat (26 vs. 8, P < 0.001). The numerical rating score for difficulty of videolaryngoscope insertion into the oral cavity, delivery to the glottis, and intubation into the main bronchus were significantly lower when using the C-MAC D-blade (P < 0.001). Moreover, the duration of DLT intubation was shorter in the C-MAC D-blade group (81 s [70-97 s] vs. 95 s [78-115 s], P < 0.001). In each group, two patients underwent fiberoptic intubation after three attempts with a videolaryngoscope failed.ConclusionsIn patients with difficult airways, the GlideScope and C-MAC D-blade provided a similar success rate on the first DLT intubation attempt; however, the C-MAC D-blade offers a better glottic view, easier and faster intubation, and lower incidence of sore throat.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.