-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study
GlideScope versus C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope for double-lumen tube intubation in patients with anticipated difficult airways: A multi-center, prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
- Ping Huang, Yuwei Qiu, Ting Xu, Xiaoqiong Sun, Zhixing Lu, Yunyun Zhang, Jiangli Yu, Jingxiang Wu, Diansan Su, and Zhenling Huang.
- Department of Anesthesiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
- J Clin Anesth. 2023 Dec 1; 91: 111274111274.
Study ObjectiveVideolaryngoscopes are widely used to visualize difficult airways. Our aim was to compare the GlideScope and C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscopes for double-lumen tube (DLT) intubation in patients with difficult airways.DesignA multi-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial.SettingThree comprehensive tertiary, high-volume hospitals from 5 December 2020 to 4 November 2021.PatientsWe included 348 adult patients with anticipated difficult airways who underwent elective thoracic surgery.InterventionsPatients were randomized into two groups: GlideScope and C-MAC D-blade. Following anesthesia induction, DLT intubation was performed using different videolaryngoscopes.MeasurementsThe primary outcome was the first-pass success rate of DLT intubation. All other results were recorded as secondary outcomes.Main ResultsNo significant differences were observed in the first-pass success rate of DLT intubation between the GlideScope and C-MAC D-blade (86.21% and 89.66%, respectively; P = 0.323). However, compared with the GlideScope, the C-MAC D-blade provided a lower Cormack-Lehane grade (P < 0.001), lower rates of external laryngeal pressure (48 vs. 15, P < 0.001), and postprocedure sore throat (26 vs. 8, P < 0.001). The numerical rating score for difficulty of videolaryngoscope insertion into the oral cavity, delivery to the glottis, and intubation into the main bronchus were significantly lower when using the C-MAC D-blade (P < 0.001). Moreover, the duration of DLT intubation was shorter in the C-MAC D-blade group (81 s [70-97 s] vs. 95 s [78-115 s], P < 0.001). In each group, two patients underwent fiberoptic intubation after three attempts with a videolaryngoscope failed.ConclusionsIn patients with difficult airways, the GlideScope and C-MAC D-blade provided a similar success rate on the first DLT intubation attempt; however, the C-MAC D-blade offers a better glottic view, easier and faster intubation, and lower incidence of sore throat.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.