• Injury · Dec 2023

    Employing direct electromagnetic coupling to assess acute fracture healing: An ovine model assessment.

    • Kevin M Labus, Jakob Wolynski, Jeremiah Easley, Holly L Stewart, Milan Ilic, Branislav Notaros, Taylor Zagrocki, Christian M Puttlitz, and Kirk C McGilvray.
    • Orthopaedic Bioengineering Research Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
    • Injury. 2023 Dec 1; 54 (12): 111080111080.

    ObjectivesThis study explored the efficacy of collecting temporal fracture site compliance data via an advanced direct electromagnetic coupling (DEC) system equipped with a Vivaldi-type antenna, novel calibration technique, and multi-antenna setup (termed maDEC) as an approach to monitor acute fracture healing progress in a translational large animal model. The overarching goal of this approach was to provide insights into the acute healing dynamics, offering a promising avenue for optimizing fracture management strategies.MethodsA sample of twelve sheep, subjected to ostectomies and intramedullary nail fixations, was divided into two groups, simulating normal and impaired healing scenarios. Sequential maDEC compliance or stiffness measurements and radiographs were taken from the surgery until euthanasia at four or eight weeks and were subsequently compared with post-sacrifice biomechanical, micro-CT, and histological findings.ResultsThe results showed that the maDEC system offered straightforward quantification of fracture site compliance via a multiantenna array. Notably, the rate of change in the maDEC-measured bending stiffness significantly varied between normal and impaired healing groups during both the 4-week (p = 0.04) and 8-week (p = 0.02) periods. In contrast, radiographically derived mRUST healing measurements displayed no significant differences between the groups (p = 0.46). Moreover, the cumulative normalized stiffness maDEC data significantly correlated with post-sacrifice mechanical strength (r2 = 0.80, p < 0.001), micro-CT measurements of bone volume fraction (r2 = 0.60, p = 0.003), and density (r2 = 0.60, p = 0.003), and histomorphometric measurements of new bone area fraction (r2 = 0.61, p = 0.003) and new bone area (r2 = 0.60, p < 0.001).ConclusionsThese data indicate that the enhanced maDEC system provides a non-invasive, accurate method to monitor fracture healing during the acute healing phase, showing distinct stiffness profiles between normal and impaired healing groups and offering critical insights into the healing process's progress and efficiency.Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…