• World Neurosurg · Dec 2023

    Comparison of Prognostic Models for Functional Outcome in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Based on Machine Learning.

    • Han Wang, Tomas L Bothe, Chulei Deng, Shengyin Lv, Pratik H Khedkar, Richard Kovacs, Andreas Patzak, and Lingyun Wu.
    • Institute of Translational Physiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu, Berlin, Germany; Department of Neurosurgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.
    • World Neurosurg. 2023 Dec 1; 180: e686e699e686-e699.

    BackgroundControversy exists regarding the superiority of the performance of prognostic tools based on advanced machine learning (ML) algorithms for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). However, it is unclear whether ML prognostic models will benefit patients due to the lack of a comprehensive assessment. We aimed to develop and evaluate ML models for predicting unfavorable functional outcomes for aSAH patients and identify the model with the greatest performance.MethodsIn this retrospective study, a dataset of 955 patients with aSAH was used to construct and validate prognostic models for functional outcomes assessed using the modified Rankin scale during a follow-up period of 3-6 months. Clinical scores and clinical and radiological features on admission and secondary complications were used to construct models based on 5 ML algorithms (i.e., logistic regression [LR], k-nearest neighbor, extreme gradient boosting, random forest, and artificial neural network). For evaluation among the models, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, area under the precision-recall curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis were used.ResultsComposite models had significantly higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curves than did simple models in predicting unfavorable functional outcomes. Compared with other composite models (random forest and extreme gradient boosting) with good calibration, LR had the highest area under the precision-recall score and showed the greatest benefit in decision curve analysis.ConclusionsOf the 5 studied ML models, the conventional LR model outperformed the advanced algorithms in predicting the prognosis and could be a useful tool for health care professionals.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.