• CarvalhoMaria Cecília Ramos deMCRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Grupo de Pesquisa de Intervenções em Nutrição, 190 Alfredo Balena Avenue, Nursing School, Room 102, Santa Efigênia, 30130-100 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. Electronic address: ceciliaram, Mariana Souza Lopes, FreitasPatrícia Pinheiro dePPUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Grupo de Pesquisa de Intervenções em Nutrição, 190 Alfredo Balena Avenue, Nursing School, Room 102, Santa Efigênia, 30130-100 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. Electronic address: patpfreitas@gm, and Aline Cristine Souza Lopes.
• Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Grupo de Pesquisa de Intervenções em Nutrição, 190 Alfredo Balena Avenue, Nursing School, Room 102, Santa Efigênia, 30130-100 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. Electronic address: ceciliaramosnutri@gmail.com.
• Prev Med. 2023 Dec 1; 177: 107748107748.

ObjectiveTo assess longitudinal effects of a nutrition intervention on fruit and vegetable (F&V) intake among Primary Health Care (PHC) service participants in Belo Horizonte, Brazil.MethodsDemographics and health data on 3414 PHC service participants were collected at baseline in 2013-2014. F&V intake was assessed at baseline, 12, 36, and 48 months until 2017-2018. Services were randomized to control (CG, usual care) or intervention (IG, usual care and a Transtheoretical Model-based intervention to increase F&V intake). We performed difference-in-differences (DiD) analysis to identify intervention effects on F&V intake, and sensitivity analyses of participants observed at all timepoints.ResultsParticipants were mostly middle-aged, low-income women. Mean baseline intakes were 168.7 g of fruit, 202.0 g of vegetables, and 370.7 g of F&V, with lower fruit in the IG (164.1 g) than the CG (172.3 g). At 12 months, the intervention increased fruit intake in the IG and fruit and F&V intake among individuals with low baseline F&V intake. Fruit intake remained higher at 36 months in the IG. No effect on vegetable intake was identified. According to sensitivity analyses, effects on fruit intake among the complete sample did not remain significant at 36 months, and an effect on fruit intake at 36 months was identified among those with adequate baseline F&V intake. Reductions in F&V intake did not remain significant.ConclusionsAt 12 months, a TTM-based intervention increased fruit intake in the overall sample, and fruit and F&V intake among individuals with low baseline intakes. Repeated interventions may be needed over time.Trial Registration NumberRBR-9h7ckx.Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.

16 keywords...

hide…