• Xi Zhang, Jia-Xin Huang, Meng Tang, Qi Zhang, Li Deng, Chun-Hua Song, Wei Li, Han-Ping Shi, and Ming-Hua Cong.
• Department of Comprehensive Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; Key Laboratory of Cancer FSMP for State Market Regulation, Beijing, China; Beijing International Science and Technology Cooperation Base for Cancer Metabolism and Nutrition, Beijing, China.
• Nutrition. 2024 Jan 1; 117: 112229112229.

BackgroundMalnutrition and systemic inflammation are considered 2 hallmarks of cancer cachexia. Our study aimed to construct a modified Controlling Nutritional Status by introducing C-reactive protein as an inflammatory parameter and investigate its prognostic value in patients with cancer cachexia.MethodsThis multicenter cohort study included 5221 patients with cancer, among whom 1719 were diagnosed with cachexia. Concordance index and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to compare prognostic values between the 2 systems. The primary outcome was overall survival, and comprehensive survival analyses were performed. The secondary outcomes were short-term survival, malnutrition, and quality of life.ResultsDuring the median follow-up of 17.47 mo, 813 deaths were recorded. The modified Controlling Nutritional Status was more accurate than Controlling Nutritional Status in predicting survival in patients with cancer cachexia. Patients in the high Controlling Nutritional Status/modified Controlling Nutritional Status group had a significantly shorter overall survival. Multivariate Cox analysis confirmed high Controlling Nutritional Status (hazard ratio = 1.34, 95% CI, 1.13-1.58; P < 0.001) and modified Controlling Nutritional Status (hazard ratio = 1.46; 95% CI, 1.26-1.69; P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for survival, adjusting for confounders. In subgroup analyses, a high modified Controlling Nutritional Status score had a significantly negative effect on survival in cachexia patients with upper gastrointestinal and colorectal cancer, especially for advanced-stage (stages III and IV) patients. The risk of short-term mortality and experiencing malnutrition rose to 1.48 and 1.13 times, respectively, in the high modified Controlling Nutritional Status group, as well as that for poorer life quality.ConclusionThe modified Controlling Nutritional Status group comprehensively reflects nutritional, immune, and inflammatory status and serves as a powerful prognostic scoring system in patients with cancer cachexia.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

16 keywords...

hide…