• Kithmi N D Widanage, Manura Jithmal De Silva, Thilina Dulantha Lalitharatne, BullAnthony M JAMJDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2BX, United Kingdom., and R A R C Gopura.
• Department of Engineering and Design, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9RH, United Kingdom; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Moratuwa, Moratuwa, 10400, Sri Lanka. Electronic address: k.dickwella-widanage@sussex.ac.uk.
• Injury. 2023 Dec 1; 54 (12): 111157111157.

AbstractCircular external fixators (CEFs) are successfully used in orthopedics owing to their highly favorable stiffness characteristics which promote distraction osteogenesis. Although there are different designs of external fixators, how these features produce optimal biomechanics through structural and component designs is not well known. Therefore, the aim of this study was to conduct a review on CEFs following the PRISMA statement. A search for relevant research articles was performed on Scopus and PubMed databases providing the related keywords. Furthermore, a patent search was conducted on the Google Patent database. 126 records were found to be eligible for the review. Different designs of CEFs were summarized and tabulated based on their specific features. A bibliometric analysis was also performed on the eligible research papers. Based on the findings, the developments of CEFs in terms of materials, automation, adjustment methods, component designs, wire-clamping, and performance evaluation have been extensively discussed. The trends of the CEF design and future directions are also discussed in this review. Significant research gaps include a lack of consideration towards ease of assembly, effective wire-clamping methods, and CEFs embedded with online patient-monitoring systems, among others. An apparent lack of research interest from low-middle and low-income countries was also identified.Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

13 keywords...

hide…