• Adam M Roth, Rakshith Lokesh, Jiaqiao Tang, John H Buggeln, Carly Smith, Jan A Calalo, Seth R Sullivan, Truc Ngo, Laura St Germain, Michael J Carter, and Joshua G A Cashaback.
• Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Delaware, United States.
• Neuroscience. 2024 Mar 5; 540: 122612-26.

AbstractWhen a musician practices a new song, hitting a correct note sounds pleasant while striking an incorrect note sounds unpleasant. Such reward and punishment feedback has been shown to differentially influence the ability to learn a new motor skill. Recent work has suggested that punishment leads to greater movement variability, which causes greater exploration and faster learning. To further test this idea, we collected 102 participants over two experiments. Unlike previous work, in Experiment 1 we found that punishment did not lead to faster learning compared to reward (n = 68), but did lead to a greater extent of learning. Surprisingly, we also found evidence to suggest that punishment led to less movement variability, which was related to the extent of learning. We then designed a second experiment that did not involve adaptation, allowing us to further isolate the influence of punishment feedback on movement variability. In Experiment 2, we again found that punishment led to significantly less movement variability compared to reward (n = 34). Collectively our results suggest that punishment feedback leads to less movement variability. Future work should investigate whether punishment feedback leads to a greater knowledge of movement variability and or increases the sensitivity of updating motor actions.Copyright © 2024 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

11 keywords...

hide…