• Pediatr Crit Care Me · May 2024

    Retrospective Validation of a Computerized Physiologic Equation to Predict Minute Ventilation Needs in Critically Ill Children.

    • Jonathan H Pelletier, Jaskaran Rakkar, Alicia K Au, Dana Y Fuhrman, ClarkRobert S BRSBDivision of Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Akron Children's Hospital, Akron, OH.Division of Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, AZ.Department Critical Care Medicine, University of Pitt, Patrick M Kochanek, and Christopher M Horvat.
    • Division of Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Akron Children's Hospital, Akron, OH.
    • Pediatr Crit Care Me. 2024 May 1; 25 (5): 390395390-395.

    ObjectivesMechanical ventilation (MV) is pervasive among critically ill children. We sought to validate a computerized physiologic equation to predict minute ventilation requirements in children and test its performance against clinician actions in an in silico trial.DesignRetrospective, electronic medical record linkage, cohort study.SettingQuaternary PICU.PatientsPatients undergoing invasive MV, serial arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis within 1-6 hours, and pharmacologic neuromuscular blockade (NMB).Measurements And Main ResultsABG values were filtered to those occurring during periods of NMB. Simultaneous ABG and minute ventilation data were linked to predict serial Pa co2 and pH values using previously published physiologic equations. There were 15,121 included ABGs across 500 encounters among 484 patients, with a median (interquartile range [IQR]) of 20 (10-43) ABGs per encounter at a duration of 3.6 (2.1-4.2) hours. The median (IQR) Pa co2 prediction error was 0.00 (-3.07 to 3.00) mm Hg. In Bland-Altman analysis, the mean error was -0.10 mm Hg (95% CI, -0.21 to 0.01 mm Hg). A nested, in silico trial of ABGs meeting criteria for weaning (respiratory alkalosis) or escalation (respiratory acidosis), compared the performance of recommended ventilator changes versus clinician decisions. There were 1,499 of 15,121 ABGs (9.9%) among 278 of 644 (43.2%) encounters included in the trial. Calculated predictions were favorable to clinician actions in 1124 of 1499 ABGs (75.0%), equivalent to clinician choices in 26 of 1499 ABGs (1.7%), and worse than clinician decisions in 349 of 1499 ABGs (23.3%). Calculated recommendations were favorable to clinician decisions in sensitivity analyses limiting respiratory rate, analyzing only when clinicians made changes, excluding asthma, and excluding acute respiratory distress syndrome.ConclusionsA computerized equation to predict minute ventilation requirements outperformed clinicians' ventilator adjustments in 75% of ABGs from critically ill children in this retrospective analysis. Prospective validation studies are needed.Copyright © 2024 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.