• Demet Gür Vural, Büşra Usta, Yeliz Tanriverdi Çayci, Kemal Bilgin, and Asuman Birinci.
• Department of Medical Microbiology, Ondokuz Mayis University, Medical School, Samsun, Turkey.
• Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Mar 8; 103 (10): e37384e37384.

BackgroundThe indirect immunofluorescence assay (IIFA) utilizing antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) is widely used as a diagnostic test for autoimmune vasculitis. The presence of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) might lead to a misleading interpretation of ANCA. This study aims to explore the impact of the presence of ANA on the interpretation of ANCA.MethodsThis retrospective research examined samples negative for antiMPO and antiPR3 ANCA by IIFA and explored correlations between the ANA-IIFA results and the ANCA interpretation frequencies. Our analysis involved the use of suitable statistical methods, including Chi-square and kappa statistics.ResultsUp to 75.2% of the ANCA-IIFA-positive samples exhibited a positive p-ANCA pattern when using the ethanol-fixed substrate, with c-ANCA positivity at 24.8%. In the ANA-IIFA-positive samples, ~77.3% displayed p-ANCA patterns on ethanol-fixed substrates. A comparison between the ANA-IIFA titers and the p-ANCA results revealed that p-ANCA positivity was notably more common in samples with higher titers, and this correlation was found to be statistically significant.ConclusionPositive ANA results by IIFA tests are linked to a higher incidence of p-ANCA interpretation, particularly in cases with higher titer patterns. This insight aids laboratories in establishing effective workflows to investigate potential p-ANCA interference.Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

10 keywords...

hide…