-
Pol. Arch. Med. Wewn. · May 2024
Comparative StudyA comparison of interpretable XGBoost and artificial neural network model for the prediction of severe acute pancreatitis.
- Yajing Lu, Minhao Qiu, Shuang Pan, Zarrin Basharat, Maddalena Zippi, Sirio Fiorino, and Wandong Hong.
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China
- Pol. Arch. Med. Wewn. 2024 May 28; 134 (5).
IntroductionAcute pancreatitis (AP) that progresses to persistent organ failure is referred to as severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). It is a condition associated with a relatively high mortality. A prediction model that would facilitate early recognition of patients at risk for SAP is crucial for improvement of patient prognosis.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and artificial neural network (ANN) models for predicting SAP.Patients And MethodsA total of 648 patients with AP were enrolled. XGBoost and ANN models were developed and validated in the training (519 patients) and test sets (129 patients). The accuracy and predictive performance of the XGBoost and ANN models were evaluated using both the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) and the area under the precision‑recall curves (AUC‑PRs).ResultsA total of 15 variables were selected for model construction through a univariable analysis. The AUCs of the XGBoost and ANN models in 5‑fold cross‑validation of the training set were 0.92 (95% CI, 0.87-0.97) and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.78-0.92), respectively, whereas the AUCs for the test set were 0.93 (95% CI, 0.85-1) and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.79-0.96), respectively. The XGBoost model outperformed the ANN model in terms of both diagnostic accuracy and AUC‑PR. Individual predictions of the XGBoost model were explained using a local interpretable model‑agnostic explanation plot.ConclusionsAn interpretable XGBoost model showed better discriminatory efficiency for predicting SAP than the ANN model, and could be used in clinical practice to identify patients at risk for SAP.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.