• R J Stratta, M H Shokouh-Amiri, M F Egidi, H P Grewal, A T Kizilisik, N Nezakatgoo, L W Gaber, and A O Gaber.
• Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee, Memphis, TN 38163-2116, USA. rstratta@utmem.edu
• Ann. Surg. 2001 Jun 1; 233 (6): 740751740-51.

ObjectiveTo compare pancreas transplantation with systemic-enteric (SE) versus portal-enteric (PE) drainage in a prospective fashion.Summary Background DataTo improve the physiology of pancreas transplantation, the authors developed a new technique of portal venous delivery of insulin and enteric drainage of the exocrine secretions.MethodsDuring a 26-month period, the authors prospectively alternated 54 consecutive simultaneous kidney and pancreas transplants to either SE (n = 27) or PE (n = 27) drainage. The two groups were well matched for numerous characteristics. Maintenance immunosuppression in both groups consisted of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids.ResultsPatient survival rates were 93% SE versus 96% PE; kidney graft survival rates were 93% in both groups. Pancreas transplantation survival (complete insulin independence) was 74% after SE versus 85% after PE drainage with a mean follow-up of 17 months. The mean length of initial hospital stay was 12.4 days in the SE group and 12.8 days in the PE group. The SE group was characterized by a slight increase in the number of readmissions. The incidences of acute rejection (33%) and major infection (52%) were similar in both groups. The incidence of intraabdominal infection was slightly higher in the SE group. However, the early relaparotomy rate was similar between groups. The composite endpoint of no rejection, graft loss, or death was attained in 56% of SE versus 59% of PE patients.ConclusionsThese results suggest that simultaneous kidney and pancreas transplantation with SE or PE drainage can be performed with comparable short-term outcomes.

24 keywords...

hide…