• Shiheng Wang, Fengxia Zhang, Jianfeng Liu, and Peijie Qin.
• Institute for History of Medicine and Medical Literature, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Dongcheng District, Beijing, China.
• Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Mar 22; 103 (12): e37180e37180.

BackgroundProstate cancer is the most common cancer in men. In China, traditional Chinese medicine is used to treat prostate cancer. However, there is a lack of evidence for differences in the effectiveness and safety of different Chinese patent medicines. Therefore, we conducted this Network Meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of different Chinese patent medicines in the treatment of prostate cancer.MethodsWe systematically search PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane library, CNKI database, VIP database, wanfang database, and SinoMed Randomized controlled trials of Chinese patent medicines for the treatment of prostate cancer sores included in the database were retrieved until June 1, 2023. The included studies were assessed for risk of bias using Cochrane randomized controlled trial Bias risk Assessment tool. The main outcome indicators were Efficacy, Prostate Specific Antigen, and adverse reaction. Since different courses of treatment were used in the included studies, we used Bayesian mesh meta-regression to investigate the effects of treatment courses on efficacy and safety.ResultsTwenty-seven articles were included, involving 1885 patients. Including 9 kinds of Chinese patent medicine. The results of Network Meta-analysis show that: ① efficacy: compared with androgen antagonists, Bruceolic oil emulsion (relative risk = 1.70, 95% credibility interval [CI] (1.30, 2.29)), Compound Kushen injection (relative risk = 1.39, 95%CI (1.19, 1.70)) had significant advantages. There was no significant difference among all Chinese patent medicines (P > .05). The top 3 Chinese patent medicines were Bruceolic oil emulsion, Zhibodihuang pill, Compound Kushen injection. ② Prostate specific antigen: compared with androgen antagonists, Bruceolic oil emulsion (mean difference [MD] = -10.4, 95%CI [-17.6, -3.21]), Compound Kushen injection (MD = -4.46, 95%CI [-8.80, -1.70]), Shenfu injection (MD = -14.7, 95%CI [-23.4, -6.01]) had significant advantages. The top 3 Chinese patent medicines were Shenfu injection, Bruceolic oil emulsion, Compound Kushen injection. adverse reaction: compared with androgen antagonists, there was no significant difference among all PCM (P > .05).ConclusionCompared with androgen antagonists, Chinese patent medicine has significant difference in effectiveness. The effect of Chinese patent medicine is little affected by the course of treatment and dose. From comprehensive analysis, Bruceolic oil emulsion combined with androgen antagonist is the best intervention measures.Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

18 keywords...

hide…