• Mishal S Khan, Thirusha Naidu, Irene Torres, Muhammad Naveed Noor, Jesse B Bump, and Seye Abimbola.
• Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan. Electronic address: mishal.khan@lshtm.ac.uk.
• Lancet. 2024 Mar 30; 403 (10433): 130413081304-1308.

AbstractThe historical and contemporary alignment of medical and health journals with colonial practices needs elucidation. Colonialism, which sought to exploit colonised people and places, was justified by the prejudice that colonised people's ways of knowing and being are inferior to those of the colonisers. Institutions for knowledge production and dissemination, including academic journals, were therefore central to sustaining colonialism and its legacies today. This invited Viewpoint focuses on The Lancet, following its 200th anniversary, and is especially important given the extent of The Lancet's global influence. We illuminate links between The Lancet and colonialism, with examples from the past and present, showing how the journal legitimised and continues to promote specific types of knowers, knowledge, perspectives, and interpretations in health and medicine. The Lancet's role in colonialism is not unique; other institutions and publications across the British empire cooperated with empire-building through colonisation. We therefore propose investigations and raise questions to encourage broader contestation on the practices, audience, positionality, and ownership of journals claiming leadership in global knowledge production.Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

15 keywords...

hide…