• Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi · Apr 2012

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    [The efficacy of nebulized budesonide in acute moderate to severe exacerbations of asthma in children].

    • Ai-huan Chen, Rong-chang Chen, Jie-yi Zhan, Sui Huang, Yu-neng Lin, De-hui Chen, Cui-zhen Yang, and Nan-shan Zhong.
    • The State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical College, Guangzhou 510120, China.
    • Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2012 Apr 1;35(4):269-74.

    ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of nebulized budesonide (BUD) in acute moderate to severe exacerbations of asthma in children.MethodsForty children, 5 to 15 years of age, with acute moderate to severe attacks of asthma, were randomized into BUD group and control group, receiving nebulized 0.5% salbutamol (150 µg/kg) + 0.025% ipratropium bromide (1 ml) + 0.05% budesonide (2 ml) or nebulized 0.5% salbutamol (150 µg/kg) + 0.025% ipratropium bromide (1 ml) + saline (2 ml) at half-hourly intervals for 3 doses respectively. Lung function, respiratory rate (RR), heart rate(HR), oxygen saturation (SaO2) and clinical score (CS) were monitored.ResultsThe baseline characteristics of the 2 groups were similar. After 3 doses of nebulization, CS, RR, SaO2, FEV(1) and FEV(1)% were significantly improved in both groups (P < 0.05). The CS in BUD group was significantly lower than that in control group at the end of 2 h after the third dose of nebulization 0 (0) vs 0 (1), Z = 2.522, P = 0.012. There were no significant differences in RR, HR and SaO2 between 2 groups (P > 0.05). The improvement of FEV(1)% in the first hour and the second hour after 3 doses of nebulization was 8.0 (6.8)% and 5.5 (6.5)% in BUD group, and 6.0 (8.5)% and 1.0 (6.5)% in control group, the improvement in BUD group being significantly greater than that in control group (Z = 2.270 and 2.686, P = 0.023 and 0.007 respectively). The improvement of FEV(1) in the second hour after 3 doses of nebulization was significantly greater in BUD group than in control group 0.07 (0.12) L vs 0.01 (0.10) L, Z = 2.455, P = 0.014. The full recovery rate in BUD group at the end of 2 h after completion of nebulization was significantly higher than that in control group (17/20, 85.0% vs 9/18, 50.0%, χ(2) = 5.371, P = 0.024). The proportion of patients who needed to use oral corticosteroids was significantly lower in BUD group than in control group (3/20, 15.0% vs 8/18, 44.4%, χ(2) = 3.993, P = 0.046). The hospitalization rate was 5% (1/20) in BUD group, and 17% (3/18) in control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05).ConclusionNebulized BUD in high dose and at short intervals combined with rapid-acting bronchodilators has an additional bronchodilator response, associated with more rapid and better improvement in clinical symptoms and lung function, indicating that it is preferred in the early management of acute moderate to severe exacerbation of asthma in children.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…