• Mirza Pojskić, Miriam Bopp, Benjamin Saß, and Christopher Nimsky.
• Department of Neurosurgery, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany. Electronic address: mirza.po@gmail.com.
• World Neurosurg. 2024 Jul 1; 187: e233e256e233-e256.

BackgroundOur study presents a single-center experience of resection of intradural spinal tumors either with or without using intraoperative computed tomography-based registration and microscope-based augmented reality (AR). Microscope-based AR was recently described for improved orientation in the operative field in spine surgery, using superimposed images of segmented structures of interest in a two-dimensional or three-dimensional mode.MethodsAll patients who underwent surgery for resection of intradural spinal tumors at our department were retrospectively included in the study. Clinical outcomes in terms of postoperative neurologic deficits and complications were evaluated, as well as neuroradiologic outcomes for tumor remnants and recurrence.Results112 patients (57 female, 55 male; median age 55.8 ± 17.8 years) who underwent 120 surgeries for resection of intradural spinal tumors with the use of intraoperative neuromonitoring were included in the study, with a median follow-up of 39 ± 34.4 months. Nine patients died during the follow-up for reasons unrelated to surgery. The most common tumors were meningioma (n = 41), schwannoma (n = 37), myopapillary ependymomas (n = 12), ependymomas (n = 10), and others (20). Tumors were in the thoracic spine (n = 46), lumbar spine (n = 39), cervical spine (n = 32), lumbosacral spine (n = 1), thoracic and lumbar spine (n = 1), and 1 tumor in the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine. Four biopsies were performed, 10 partial resections, 13 subtotal resections, and 93 gross total resections. Laminectomy was the common approach. In 79 cases, patients experienced neurologic deficits before surgery, with ataxia and paraparesis as the most common ones. After surgery, 67 patients were unchanged, 49 improved and 4 worsened. Operative time, extent of resection, clinical outcome, and complication rate did not differ between the AR and non-AR groups. However, the use of AR improved orientation in the operative field by identification of important neurovascular structures.ConclusionsHigh rates of gross total resection with favorable neurologic outcomes in most patients as well as low recurrence rates with comparable complication rates were noted in our single-center experience. AR improved intraoperative orientation and increased surgeons' comfort by enabling early identification of important anatomic structures; however, clinical and radiologic outcomes did not differ, when AR was not used.Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

30 keywords...

hide…