• H V Genzwuerker, A Fritz, J Hinkelbein, T Finteis, A Schlaefer, M Schaeffer, E Thil, and H J Rapp.
• Clinic of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany. harald.genzwuerker@anaes.ma.uni-heidelberg.de
• Paediatr Anaesth. 2006 Dec 1;16(12):1251-6.

BackgroundWhile reports of the use of laryngeal mask airway (LMA)-Classic in great patient numbers are available, data on the use of the laryngeal tube (LT) in this age group is limited. The two devices are compared in a prospective randomized trial to evaluate success rates and quality of airway seal.MethodsSixty children, aged 2-8 years, scheduled for elective surgical interventions were randomized to be ventilated with LMA or LT. Standardized anesthesia was induced with fentanyl and propofol. Number of insertion attempts, time until first tidal volume and intraoperative tidal volumes, and peak pressures were recorded. Airway leak pressure was measured with cuff pressure adjusted to 60 cmH(2)O.ResultsDemographic data were comparable, average age in the LMA/LT group was 5.2 +/- 1.9/5.3 +/- 1.9 years. Insertion was successful in 29 of 30 patients in the LMA group (second attempt 8) and in all patients in the LT group (second attempt 3). Time until first tidal volume for LMA/LT was 23.1 +/- 7.3/19.2 +/- 8.6 s (P < 0.05). Peak airway pressures for LMA and LT were 15.3 +/- 3.4 and 17.1 +/- 4.0 cmH(2)O (P < 0.05) with tidal volumes of 10.2 +/- 2.2 and 10.2 +/- 1.9 ml.kg(-1), airway leak pressure was 19.2 +/- 8.6 cmH(2)O for LMA and 26.3 +/- 7.3 cmH(2)O for LT (P < 0.001).ConclusionInsertion success rate is high with both LMA and LT in the age group studied. The airway leak pressure, serving as an estimate to judge quality of airway seal, is higher with the LT.

20 keywords...

hide…