-
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak · Jul 2024
Comparative StudyAssessing the Accuracy of AI Models in Orthodontic Knowledge: A Comparative Study Between ChatGPT-4 and Google Bard.
- Sadia Naureen and Huma Ghazanfar Kiani.
- Department of Orthodontics, Rawal Institute of Health Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan.
- J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2024 Jul 1; 34 (7): 761766761-766.
ObjectiveTo compare the knowledge accuracy of ChatGPT-4 and Google Bard in response to knowledge-based questions related to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment modalities.Study DesignCross-sectional comparative study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Orthodontics, Rawal Institute of Health Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan, from June 23rd to August 30th 2023.MethodologyA comprehensive content analysis was designed based on a mini implant-assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE), clear aligners (CA), and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), involving 30 questions for each category (total = 90) derived from recent review articles. Questions were prepared and presented to two large language models (LLMs): Google Bard and ChatGPT-4. Two independent raters evaluated the accuracy of the responses using a scoring system ranging from one to five, by comparing the answers to a standard key. Statistical analyses, including the paired sample t-test, were used to assess the performance of the two language models.ResultsGPT-4 demonstrated superior performance, outperforming Google Bard significantly in the MARPE, CBCT, and CA categories, and achieved a higher mean score. A p-value was found to be (p = 0.001) for MARPE and CBCT, while it was (p = 0.013) for CA. Overall, GPT-4 achieved a total score of 92.6%, surpassing Google Bard's which was 72%.ConclusionGPT-4 is more efficient than Google Bard in providing accurate and up-to-date information regarding recent trends in orthodontic treatment modalities.Key WordsAligners, Cone beam computed tomography, ChatGPT-4, Google Bard, Mini implant-assisted rapid palatal expansion.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.