• J Coll Physicians Surg Pak · Jul 2024

    Comparative Study

    Assessing the Accuracy of AI Models in Orthodontic Knowledge: A Comparative Study Between ChatGPT-4 and Google Bard.

    • Sadia Naureen and Huma Ghazanfar Kiani.
    • Department of Orthodontics, Rawal Institute of Health Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan.
    • J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2024 Jul 1; 34 (7): 761766761-766.

    ObjectiveTo compare the knowledge accuracy of ChatGPT-4 and Google Bard in response to knowledge-based questions related to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment modalities.Study DesignCross-sectional comparative study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Orthodontics, Rawal Institute of Health Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan, from June 23rd to August 30th 2023.MethodologyA comprehensive content analysis was designed based on a mini implant-assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE), clear aligners (CA), and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), involving 30 questions for each category (total = 90) derived from recent review articles. Questions were prepared and presented to two large language models (LLMs): Google Bard and ChatGPT-4. Two independent raters evaluated the accuracy of the responses using a scoring system ranging from one to five, by comparing the answers to a standard key. Statistical analyses, including the paired sample t-test, were used to assess the performance of the two language models.ResultsGPT-4 demonstrated superior performance, outperforming Google Bard significantly in the MARPE, CBCT, and CA categories, and achieved a higher mean score. A p-value was found to be (p = 0.001) for MARPE and CBCT, while it was (p = 0.013) for CA. Overall, GPT-4 achieved a total score of 92.6%, surpassing Google Bard's which was 72%.ConclusionGPT-4 is more efficient than Google Bard in providing accurate and up-to-date information regarding recent trends in orthodontic treatment modalities.Key WordsAligners, Cone beam computed tomography, ChatGPT-4, Google Bard, Mini implant-assisted rapid palatal expansion.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.