-
Randomized Controlled Trial
The responsiveness of different exercise tests in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: a randomised controlled trial.
- Theresa C Harvey-Dunstan, Molly M Baldwin, Ruth Tal-Singer, Matthew Allinder, Michael I Polkey, Alan Hamilton, Matthew Richardson, Sarah A Edwards, Michael C Steiner, Mike D Morgan, Sally J Singh, and COPD/MAP Consortium.
- Institute for Lung Health, Leicester NIHR Biomedical Research Centre - Respiratory, Leicester, England.
- Chest. 2025 Jan 1; 167 (1): 9811198-111.
BackgroundCOPD is characterized by reduced exercise tolerance, and improving physical performance is an important therapeutic goal. A variety of exercise tests are commonly used to assess exercise tolerance, including laboratory and field-based tests. The responsiveness of these various tests to common COPD interventions is yet to be compared, but the results may inform test selection in clinical and research settings.Research QuestionWhat exercise test possesses the greatest sensitivity to change from before to after intervention in patients with COPD?Study Design And MethodsOne hundred fifty-four patients with symptomatic COPD were recruited and randomized (2:1:1) to 6 weeks of long-acting muscarinic antagonist, pulmonary rehabilitation (PR), or usual care. Before and after intervention, participants performed an incremental cycle exercise test and constant work rate cycle test (CWRCT), incremental shuttle walk test and endurance shuttle walk test (ESWT), 6-min walk test, and 4-m gait speed test.ResultsOne hundred three participants (mean ± SD age, 67 ± 8 years; 75 male participants [73%]; FEV1, 50.6 ± 16.8% predicted) completed the study. Significant improvements in the incremental cycle exercise test, CWRCT, incremental cycle exercise test, ESWT, and 6-min walk test results were observed after PR (P < .05), with the greatest improvements seen in the constant work rate protocols (percentages change: CWRCT, 42%; ESWT, 41%).InterpretationThe ESWT and CWRCT seemed to be the most responsive exercise test protocols to long-acting muscarinic antagonist and PR therapy. The magnitude of change was much greater after a program of rehabilitation compared with bronchodilator therapy.Clinical Trial RegistryInternational Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN): No. 64759523; URL: https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN64759523.Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f370b/f370b44d1a004df56edc8267f91b4a82cdb5a705" alt="alt text"
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.