• Jaya Amaram-Davila, Maria Franco Vega, Min Ji Kim, Shalini Dalal, Rony Dev, Kimberson Tanco, Sonal Admane, De MoraesAline RozmanARDepartment of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine (J.A.D., M.J.K., S.D., R.D., K.T., S.A., A.Z.M., L.A.T., P.B., D.H., J.A., A.H., E.B., A.K.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, Texas, USA., Lisa A Thomas, Zeena Shelal, Meghana Gogineni, Patricia Bramati, Diana Urbauer, David Hui, Joseph Arthur, Ali Haider, Eduardo Bruera, and Akhila Reddy.
• Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine (J.A.D., M.J.K., S.D., R.D., K.T., S.A., A.Z.M., L.A.T., P.B., D.H., J.A., A.H., E.B., A.K.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, Texas, USA. Electronic address: jsamaram@mdanderson.org.
• J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024 Dec 1; 68 (6): e500e507e500-e507.

ContextNaloxone nasal spray is recommended for patients with risk factors for opioid overdose. However, cancer patients' perceptions and beliefs regarding naloxone prescriptions and their self-perceived risks for overdose are understudied.ObjectiveTo determine the proportion of cancer patients at risk for overdose who perceived naloxone as beneficial.MethodsBetween July 2020 and April 2022, we surveyed 150 adult patients from the supportive care ambulatory clinic at a tertiary cancer center in the United States who received a co-prescription of naloxone nasal spray. We measured patients' knowledge of overdose risk-factors, attitudes, beliefs, and education received on naloxone. Risk-factors between beneficial vs. nonbeneficial groups were analyzed. The survey was administered on paper or via a telephone interview.ResultsOf the 150 patients, 55% were male, 70% were white, and 81% had advanced cancer. The majority of patients believed naloxone was beneficial (100/150, 67%). When compared to the nonbeneficial group, more patients from the beneficial group agreed that the concurrent use of alcohol (100% vs. 90%; P = 0.004) or sedating drugs (96% vs. 85%; P = 0.04) with opioids could result in overdoses and felt safe having naloxone at home (95% vs. 60%; P <0.0001). More patients from the nonbeneficial group associated naloxone prescription with being suspected of misusing opioids (12/50 vs. 8/100; P = 0.01), and fewer had confidence in their caregivers' ability to administer naloxone (69% vs. 95%; P < 0.0001).ConclusionMost patients understood the benefits of naloxone and felt safe having one at home. More research is needed to identify knowledge gaps and develop educational strategies for those who find it nonbeneficial.Crown Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

27 keywords...

hide…