• Radosław Wontor, Bogusława Ołpińska, Maria Łoboz-Rudnicka, Rafał Wyderka, Krzysztof Dudek, Krystyna Łoboz-Grudzień, and Joanna Jaroch.
• Pol. Arch. Med. Wewn. 2024 Nov 28; 134 (11).

IntroductionSince proper risk stratification in a growing population of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is challenging, a potential advantage of adding the elements of geriatric assessment to the commonly used Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) 2.0 scale in predicting the risk of 6‑month death requires investigation.Patients And MethodsThe study group included 196 patients aged at least 65 years (mean [SD], 74.4 [8] years), hospitalized for ACS. The risk of 6‑month mortality was assessed with the GRACE scale, frailty syndrome (FS) with the TFI questionnaire, cognitive impairment with the Polish adaptation of the MMSE, and multimorbidity with the CAD-specific index. After 6 months, a follow‑up telephone call was performed.ResultsTo assess whether adding TFI, MMSE, and CAD‑specific index to the GRACE 2.0 scale improves its prognostic value, normalization was carried out. In comparison with GRACE alone (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.713), a combination of GRACE (normalized) and TFI (normalized) had higher predictive power for 6‑month mortality (AUC = 0.737). The risk of death was 7 times greater (relative risk of 7.02) in the patients who scored over 55.8 points in the test based on the GRACE and TFI. In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, the model based on GRACE, TFI, and MMSE (the lowest value of the Akaike information criterion) most effectively predicted the risk of death.ConclusionsAdding the FS assessment to the traditional GRACE scale improves its prognostic value in elderly patients with ACS.

26 keywords...

hide…