• Omer Tammo, Elif Celik, Enes Celik, Denizhan Bayramoglu, and Suleyman Yildiz.
• Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mardin Training and Research Hospital, Artuklu/Mardin, Turkiye.
• J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2024 Nov 1; 34 (11): 139013921390-1392.

AbstractThe aim of this study was to perform histopathological analysis of residual material in the cannula by endometrial sampling using a Carmen injector, and to compare the results. The study was conducted in the Department of Gynaecology, Mardin Training and Research Hospital, Artuklu/Mardin, Turkiye, from December 2021 to June 2022. The study group consisted of 104 patients who presented to the outpatient clinic with complaints of abnormal uterine bleeding. Endometrial curettage material was collected from all patients using a Carmen injector. The collected material was discharged into the pathology container (Group 1). Subsequently, the residual material remaining in the injector was placed in a separate pathology container (Group 2). Specimens were sent to the pathology laboratory with buffered formol. The pathological evaluation was performed by the same pathologist without revealing the patients' names. Comparative histopathological results of the patients in Group 1 and Group 2 were found to be fully compatible in 64.4% of the patients. In 35.6% of the patients, the histopathological results were different from each other between Group 1 and Group 2. Pathological results were different from each other in 21.2% of patients with incompatible pathology results. In Group 1, 16.7% of the patients were over-diagnosed, while 7.7% of the patients were over-diagnosed in Group 2. It would be beneficial to carefully remove the material remaining in the cannula and send it for pathological examination as it may affect the histopathological results. Key Words: Abnormal uterine bleeding, Probe curettage, Karman cannula, Histopathological evaluation.

13 keywords...

hide…