• Medicine · Feb 2019

    Review

    Comparison of the effectiveness of different umbilical cord care in infants: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis.

    • Yi Shang and Yue Sun.
    • Department of General Surgery, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University.
    • Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb 1; 98 (6): e14440e14440.

    BackgroundMore and more studies were performed to explore the effectiveness of umbilical cord care practices. However, the results remain controversial. Hence, the aim of the review was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of different umbilical cord care in infants through network meta-analysis.MethodsA systematic literature search for relevant articles published in the English language will be conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane library, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database from their inception to December 2018. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effectiveness of different types of umbilical cord care practices will be included. Cord infection, illness, and death will be used to assess the clinical effect. Risk of bias assessment of the included RCTs will be conducted by the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The WinBUGS 1.4.3 software will be used to perform the network meta-analysis and the result figures will be generated by STATA V.15.0 software. Grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation will be used to assess the quality of evidence.ResultsThe results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.ConclusionThis will be the first network meta-analysis to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of different umbilical cord care in infants. Our study will generate evidence of cord care for infants and provide suggestions for clinical practice or guideline.Prospero Registration NumberCRD42018118052.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…