• Erika Leemann Price, Sylvia Bereknyei, Alma Kuby, Wendy Levinson, and Clarence Henry Braddock.
• Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, CA 94121, USA. erika.price@ucsf.edu
• Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Mar 1;86(3):335-41.

ObjectiveTo explore older adults' views of existing informed decision making (IDM) elements and investigate the need for additional elements.MethodsWe recruited persons 65 and older to participate in six focus groups. Participants completed questionnaires about IDM preferences, and discussed videotapes of idealized patient-physician interactions in light of seven IDM elements: (1) discussion of the patient's role in decision making; (2) discussion of the clinical issue; (3) discussion of alternatives; (4) discussion of benefits/risks; (5) discussion of uncertainties; (6) assessment of patient understanding; and (7) exploration of patient preference. We used a modified grounded theory approach to assess agreement with existing IDM elements and identify new elements.ResultsIn questionnaires, 97-100% of 59 participants rated each IDM element as "somewhat" or "very" important. Qualitative analysis supported existing elements and suggested two more: opportunity for input from trusted others, and discussion of decisions' impacts on patients' daily lives. Elements overlapped with global communication themes.ConclusionFocus groups affirmed existing IDM elements and suggested two more with particular relevance for older patients.Practice ImplicationsIncorporation of additional IDM elements into clinical practice can enhance informed participation of older adults in decision making.Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

19 keywords...

hide…