• Bmc Med · Nov 2024

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    Characterizing the pharmacological interaction of the antimalarial combination artefenomel-piperaquine in healthy volunteers with induced blood-stage Plasmodium falciparum to predict efficacy in patients with malaria.

    • Azrin N Abd-Rahman, Daniel Kaschek, Anne Kümmel, Rebecca Webster, Adam J Potter, Anand Odedra, Stephen D Woolley, Stacey Llewellyn, Lachlan Webb, Louise Marquart, Stephan Chalon, GaaloulMyriam ElMEMedicines for Malaria Venture, Geneva, Switzerland., James S McCarthy, Jörg J Möhrle, and Bridget E Barber.
    • QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
    • Bmc Med. 2024 Nov 28; 22 (1): 563563.

    BackgroundThe combination antimalarial artefenomel-piperaquine failed to achieve target efficacy in a phase 2b study in Africa and Vietnam. We retrospectively evaluated whether characterizing the pharmacological interaction of this antimalarial combination in a volunteer infection study (VIS) would have enabled prediction of the phase 2b study results.MethodsTwenty-four healthy adults enrolled over three consecutive cohorts were inoculated with Plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes on day 0. Participants were randomized within each cohort to one of seven dose combination groups and administered a single oral dose of artefenomel-piperaquine on day 8. Participants received definitive antimalarial treatment with artemether-lumefantrine upon parasite regrowth or on day 42 ± 2. The general pharmacodynamic interaction (GPDI) model implemented in the Bliss Independence additivity criterion was developed to characterize the pharmacological interaction between artefenomel and piperaquine. Simulations based on the model were performed to predict the outcomes of the phase 2b combination study.ResultsFor a dose of 800 mg artefenomel administered with 640 mg, 960 mg, or 1440 mg piperaquine, the simulated adequate parasitological response at day 28 (APR28), incorporating actual patient pharmacokinetic (PK) data from the phase 2b trial, was 69.4%, 63.9%, and 74.8%, respectively. These results closely matched the observed APR28 in the phase 2b trial of 67.0%, 65.5%, and 75.4%, respectively.ConclusionsThese results indicate that VIS offer an efficient means for informing antimalarial combination trials conducted in the field, potentially expediting clinical development.Trial RegistrationThis study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov on 11 May 2018 with registration number NCT03542149.© 2024. The Author(s).

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.