• J Clin Anesth · Jan 2025

    Observational Study

    The clinical application of transcutaneous carbon dioxide monitoring during rigid bronchoscopy or microlaryngeal surgery in children.

    • Jan J van Wijk, Norani H Gangaram-Panday, Willem van Weteringen, Bas Pullens, Simone E Bernard, Sanne E Hoeks, ReissIrwin K MIKMDepartment of Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care, Division of Neonatology, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands., Robert J Stolker, and Lonneke M Staals.
    • Department of Anesthesiology, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: j.j.vanwijk@erasmusmc.nl.
    • J Clin Anesth. 2025 Jan 1; 100: 111692111692.

    Study ObjectiveDuring rigid bronchoscopies and microlaryngeal surgery (MLS) in children, there is currently no reliable method for managing ventilation strategies based on carbon dioxide (CO2) levels. This study aimed to investigate the effects of the clinical implementation of transcutaneous CO2 (tcPCO2) monitoring during rigid bronchoscopies or MLS.DesignProspective observational study.SettingOperating theatre of a tertiary pediatric hospital, from January 2019 to March 2021.PatientsChildren with an age < 18 years, undergoing rigid bronchoscopy or MLS, were eligible for inclusion. Children with tracheostomy and/or skin conditions limiting tcPCO2 monitoring were excluded.InterventionsTcPCO2 monitoring was performed in two groups; blinded before clinical implementation (control group) and visible for ventilation management after clinical implementation (tcPCO2 group).MeasurementsThe total tcPCO2 load outside of the normal range (35-48 mm Hg) was calculated as the area under the curve (AUC) and compared between the groups. Anesthesiologists in the tcPCO2 group received a questionnaire after each procedure.Main ResultsA total of 120 patients were included. No significant differences were found between the two groups in the AUC during the procedure (19,202 (7,863-44,944) vs 17,737 (9,800-47,566) mm Hg · s, P = 0.84) or between different ventilation strategies. The maximal tcPCO2 level was 69.2 (62.1-81.2) mm Hg in the control group and 71.1 (62.8-80.8) mm Hg, (P = 0.85) in the tcPCO2 group. Spontaneous breathing was associated with lower tcPCO2 levels. The general satisfaction score of tcPCO2 monitoring rated by the anesthesiologist was 8.19 (0.96).ConclusionsTcPCO2 levels reached approximately twice the upper limit of the normal range during rigid bronchoscopy and MLS. Availability of tcPCO2 monitoring did not affect these high levels, despite adjustments in strategy. However, tcPCO2 monitoring provides valuable insight in CO2 load and applied ventilation strategies.Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.